BTC—ETH—BNB—SOL—XRP—USDC—TRX—ADA—DOGE—
Data by CoinGecko

JuJudog slash vote passes over contract claims

An Ethos Network slash vote against the project JuJudog passed decisively, concluding with a final tally of 169 upvotes and 0 downvotes. The community vote, which was initiated by an Ethos user with a score of 1923, involved exactly 237 points at stake. Following the resolution of this passed vote, the current Ethos score for JuJudog sits at 934 on the platform.

The slash alleged that the project posted a fake contract claiming Bubblemaps was paid by Proxima. Furthermore, the slash alleged that the account behind JuJudog previously operated under the old username pumppumpkinio and falsely claimed to be acquired by Pumpfun through a similar false contract. The slash alleged that the operator repeated this deceptive behavior to promote a direct competitor to Bubblemaps. Emphasizing the repeated nature of these actions, the slash text noted they did it "Again with a fabricated contract."

JuJudog slash vote passes over contract claims
“Posted a fake contract claiming Bubblemaps was paid by Proxima. For the second time.”

On the Ethos Network, penalties typically apply when a project is successfully slashed. For this event, zero accounts that backed the project are affected by a passed slash. The system recorded null supporters affected and null supporter points at stake for this specific vote, meaning no existing backers faced direct point deductions from this particular event.

Looking at the broader context of the project, JuJudog has accumulated a total of two negative reviews. The project currently holds zero positive reviews and zero neutral reviews on its Ethos profile. These other reviews outline similar accusations regarding forged documents and deceptive conduct on social media. One negative review, written by an Ethos user with a score of 1431, detailed an alleged ongoing controversy involving a fake contract and an older token deployment that led to complaints from token holders. Another negative review, posted by a user with a score of 1401, criticized the project for its aggressive marketing tactics against other companies. That reviewer stated the account was used for "a reputation attack via a fake contract and to promote their own competing product" in the decentralized finance ecosystem.

Earlier: JuJudog Faces Open Slash Vote Over Fake Contracts. Source: the slash vote on Ethos Network. Project on X: @jujudog69.

← All stories